Created: Thu Jun 05 2025 15:45:14 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
Title: Relative Deprivation: Understanding the Concept, Causes, Impacts, and Solutions
Relative Deprivation: Understanding the Concept, Causes, Impacts, and Solutions
Relative deprivation is a foundational concept in social psychology, sociology, and political science, addressing the perception of disadvantage people experience when they compare themselves to others. It is less about actual material wealth or well-being and more about subjective feelings of deprivation or inequality when individuals believe they are entitled to more than what they possess, relative to their peers or reference groups. This psychological and social phenomenon has significant implications for societal cohesion, mental health, economic behavior, and collective action.
Relative deprivation occurs when individuals or groups perceive themselves as unfairly disadvantaged compared to others, regardless of their absolute circumstances. Runciman (1966), credited with formalizing the term, distinguished between:
Concept | Description |
---|---|
Absolute Deprivation | Lacking basic resources (food, shelter, etc.) |
Relative Deprivation | Feeling deprived relative to others |
Egoistic Deprivation | Individual-based comparison |
Fraternalistic Deprivation | Group-based comparison |
Peter Townsend expanded on Runciman's framework, focusing on four main preconditions for relative deprivation to occur:
Precondition | Example |
---|---|
1. Lacks something | Cannot afford the latest technology |
2. Observes others possess it | Sees friends or neighbors owning new smartphones |
3. Wants/feels entitled to it | Believes owning a smartphone is a social necessity |
4. Has realistic prospects | Thinks that acquiring a smartphone is possible given their circumstances |
Festinger's Social Comparison Theory (1954) posits that individuals determine their own social and personal worth based on comparisons to others, which can instigate feelings of relative deprivation.
Relative deprivation is not simply a result of material inequality, but rather it is a product of social and psychological processes. Common causes include:
Cause | Explanation & Example |
---|---|
Rising expectations | Economic growth raises standards, making previous norms inadequate |
Social mobility | Comparing upwardly mobile peers triggers dissatisfaction |
Media exposure | Seeing privileged lifestyles on social media or TV intensifies perceived deprivation |
Segregation & inequality | Living near wealthier groups enhances feeling of being disadvantaged |
Discriminatory policies | Systemic injustice targets specific groups, setting reference groups apart |
Relative deprivation influences behavior, emotions, and societal dynamics.
Effect | Manifestation |
---|---|
Mental health issues | Stress, anxiety, depression |
Political mobilization | Protests, social movements |
Criminal behavior | Property crimes, theft in response to deprivation |
Decreased social cohesion | Increased resentment, breakdown of trust |
Consumerism | Over-spending to 'keep up' with peers |
Case Example:
Research links relative deprivation to increased rates of crime in otherwise affluent societies, where disparities are visible. For instance, income inequality in urban areas correlates with higher rates of property crime, driven partially by feelings of deprivation among less affluent groups.
Employees who feel underappreciated or underpaid compared to coworkers are more likely to feel dissatisfied and may underperform, quit, or foment workplace conflict.
Many major social movements (e.g., Civil Rights Movement, Arab Spring) were driven by collective feelings of fraternalistic deprivation—one's group being unfairly denied opportunities or rights enjoyed by others.
Students from less privileged backgrounds often feel deprived compared to wealthier classmates. This can affect aspiration, achievement, and overall well-being.
While absolute deprivation is about the lack of basic needs, relative deprivation is felt even when basic needs are met, as long as others are perceived to be better off. This can explain why people in wealthy societies may feel dissatisfied or unhappy despite high living standards.
Mitigating relative deprivation requires both structural and psychological approaches:
Policy/Approach | Potential Impact |
---|---|
Progressive Taxation | Reduces income disparities |
Universal Basic Income | Ensures a safety net for all |
Diversity in Representation | Reduces symbolic deprivation |
Community Integration | Enhances empathy and common purpose |
Relative deprivation highlights the complex, subjective nature of human satisfaction and social harmony. It explains why even objectively improving living standards may not quell dissatisfaction or unrest if disparities remain large or visible. Understanding its dynamics is vital for policymakers, business leaders, educators, and individuals alike, offering pathways to create more just, equitable, and content societies.
References:
For a deeper understanding, readers are encouraged to explore current research articles and policy papers examining relative deprivation in specific contexts such as wealth inequality, health disparities, and the digital divide.