When Borders Aren't Enough: Southeast Asia’s Tug-of-War Over “Their Own People” Abroad

What does a passport really mean in times of crisis? As images of crowded airports and anxious faces flicker across our screens, one uncomfortable truth stands out: Southeast Asia’s nations are becoming less defined by geographical boundaries and more by the invisible lines of citizenship, ethnicity, and nationality. In an age where you can evacuate someone at midnight from a distant country but still debate if they “belong” at home, how much have we truly learned about regional solidarity, loyalty, and the responsibilities of the state?

---

The Passport Paradox: The Illusion of Belonging

Who gets to be saved? When disaster strikes in a foreign land, embassies swing into action—but only for their own citizens. This brings to the fore divisive questions:

• Does citizenship trump ethnicity, or vice versa?
• Can Southeast Asia claim unity when rescue operations highlight divisions?
• Are we caring for humans, or just for holders of the “right” booklets?

Let’s break down how the region’s states view their people abroad:

Country	Approach to Diaspora	Crisis Response Attitude	Notable Policies/Past Incidents
Singapore	Strictly passport-based, selective dual citizenship	Efficient, high-standard consular aid, but selectively stringent	Swift evacuation, but only for passport holders
Malaysia	Broader inclusion of ethnic Malays and Muslims in rhetoric, but policy is citizenship-led	Inclusive in rhetoric, but operational challenges for non-citizens	Programs for “Overseas Malaysians” with sporadic support for stateless communities
Indonesia	Emphasis on national identity, community ties still strong	Large scale evacuations even for informal workers	Major evacuations during Middle East crises

---

The Dilemma: Who Gets Left Behind?

Evacuations are a stark test of national priorities—those without proper documentation, the stateless, and mixed-heritage Southeast Asians often find themselves with nowhere to turn. Isn’t this just modern-day gatekeeping with jets?

The Underlying Questions

• Moral Responsibility: Should a country help only its citizens, or extend a helping hand based on shared language, religion, or historical ties?
• Social Divide: Does this reinforce perceptions of “real” and “lesser” nationals?
• Pragmatism vs. Principle: Is it realistic—or even safe—for embassies to take all comers in a crisis?

---

Diaspora Dilemmas: If You Leave, Do You Still Belong?

The foundations of “imagined communities” are built on citizenship and loyalty, but modern mobility muddles these assurances. Nearly one in four Singaporeans and Malaysians live or study abroad, yet their standing as “insiders” is perpetually debated.

Pros & Cons of a Strict Citizenship Approach

Pros	Cons
Clear legal and diplomatic framework	Leaves many in limbo (stateless, mixed)
Simplifies logistics in emergencies	Ignores historic, familial, ethnic ties
Prevents diplomatic disputes	Can fuel resentment and social division

---

Southeast Asia’s Not-so-United Front

Despite decades of “ASEAN brotherhood,” crises reveal fault lines. Joint evacuations are rare—countries prefer to handle “their own” first. Yet, cultural memories of migration, intermarriage, and cross-border kinship blur the lines.

Surprising Fact: Southeast Asia is home to millions of “overseas” citizens with deeply intertwined family lineages, yet consular help remains frustratingly rigid and disconnected from these realities.

Public Perceptions

Polls routinely show most Southeast Asians expect governments to help nationals abroad—but public sympathy wanes for expatriates seen as “privileged,” or whose loyalty is questioned.

Scenario	Public Sympathy	Government Likelihood to Help
Students or workers in danger	High	High
Stateless or “new” citizens	Mixed	Low
Dual citizens with weak ties	Low	Very Low

---

Conclusion: The Broader Phenomenon

Evacuations are more than just logistical exercises—they’re moral cross-examinations. As Southeast Asia grows wealthier, more mobile, and more complicated, the real test isn’t in the efficiency of airlifts, but in whether our borders can stretch enough to recognize the bonds that make us human, not just citizens.

---

This article was inspired by the headline: '1 Singaporean, 17 Malaysians among 24 people evacuated from Iran to Kuala Lumpur '.