When Superpowers Call Out Superpowers: The Tangled Web of Global Credibility

When the world’s most powerful nations point fingers, what are they really saying? As China accuses the United States of damaging its credibility over military actions in Iran, the statement echoes beyond headlines—it shakes the foundations of modern international order, trust, and hypocrisy.

The Global Pot Calling the Kettle Black?

The United States has long positioned itself as a moral compass for international behavior, promoting democracy and human rights—sometimes at the barrel of a gun. But it’s not alone in playing this contradictory game: China, too, craves legitimacy and influence while drawing scrutiny for its own internal and external actions.

Table: U.S. vs. China—Perceptions of Global Credibility

Issue	USA	China
Military Intervention	Frequent, justified as “spreading democracy”	Rare, but expanding military reach
Human Rights Record	Criticizes others, inconsistent at home (e.g., Guantanamo, police violence)	Accused of severe violations (Xinjiang, censorship)
Alliances	Tight global web (NATO, alliances in Asia)	Non-interventionist, selective partnerships
Economic Model	Capitalist, open markets (with exceptions)	State-directed capitalism, restrictions
Soft Power	Hollywood, universities, NGOs	Confucius Institutes, tech platforms

Ethics: Is There Such a Thing as a Credible Superpower?

Ethical foreign policy is as elusive as it is applauded. The U.S. calls out China for lack of transparency and suppression. China returns the favor, highlighting U.S. interventions that leave nations destabilized.

Are either justified? Are these moral critiques genuine, or tools of power?

Conflicting Viewpoints:

• Realists argue it’s all self-interest: Morality is a weapon, not a guide.
• Idealists hope for accountable leadership and higher standards.
• Critics everywhere highlight “whataboutism”—deflection rather than responsibility.

Why “Credibility” Even Matters

Credibility is soft power, the grease of alliances and the backbone of deterrence. When a nation’s words carry weight, it can sway markets, win allies, and prevent conflict. Lose credibility, lose the capacity to lead.

Surprising Fact:
According to the 2023 Edelman Trust Barometer, only 33% of the global public trusts the U.S. “to do the right thing,” and just 27% trust China.

Technology, Propaganda, & Perception Wars

Modern geopolitics isn’t just about bombs and treaties—it’s about narrative. Both China and the U.S. pour billions into influencing global perception:

• The U.S. has Hollywood, Twitter, and freedom-of-information appeals.
• China leverages TikTok’s global reach, Belt and Road messaging, and state-controlled narratives.

The New Battleground: Credibility Online

• Deepfakes, disinformation, and cyberwarfare muddy the waters further.
• Younger generations are doubting all traditional powers, creating fertile ground for mistrust and populism.

Cultural & Historical Echoes

Both nations’ credibility disputes aren’t new. From the Vietnam War to Tiananmen Square, from Iraq to Hong Kong, their moral high ground has been repeatedly questioned. What’s changed is the speed and ferocity with which these accusations now circle the globe.

Era	Major Credibility Crisis (USA)	Major Credibility Crisis (China)
1960s-70s	Vietnam War, Watergate	Cultural Revolution
1980s-90s	Iran-Contra, Gulf War I	Tiananmen Square, economic opening
2000s-Present	Iraq, Snowden, Guantanamo	Xinjiang, Hong Kong, COVID-19 origins

So, Who Judges the Judges?

Here’s the bitter irony: Credibility is defined by those you seek to influence. When rivals call each other untrustworthy, it reveals both their self-interest and mutual weaknesses. The world’s less powerful nations are watching, learning, and sometimes hedging their bets, seeing that no global sheriff plays fair.

The lesson? The more loudly superpowers denounce each other, the more obvious their shared flaws become—and the harder it is for anyone to claim the trust of a skeptical, watching world.

---

This article was inspired by the headline: 'China says US attack on Iran has damaged its credibility'.